EQUALITY FOR ALL NOT EXCLUSIVE TO TRANSGENDER’S

THE TRANSGENDER INSANITY

By Donna Brown, Bowles
May, 15 2016

If transgenders really want equality and fairness not exclusive to THEM ONLY; why not create a transgender bathroom alongside the men and women’s restrooms?

It’s estimated that 700,000 people in the United States, or about 0.2 to 0.3 percent of the population identify as transgender. LGBT demographics of the United States – Wikipedia, the free ….This preposterous law will give EVERY PEDOPHILE and RAPIST a free ticket to rape, molest, abuse, and possibly kill, your mother, wife, daughter, son, not excluding transgender’s either.

image

Rapist and pedophiles alike will take full advantage of this law and claim to be transgender also.

image

I ask you, is this law just?
Is this law fair?
Does this law demonstrate “equality?”
Does this law provide protection for EVERYONE?
No, it DOESN’T; however, it was NEVER about EQUALITY!
IT IS, AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN, ABOUT DESTROYING OUR AMERICAN VALUES, AND OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS; Our inalienable Rights that are essential Limitations in all Governments.” Francis Hutcheson placed clear limits on his notion of inalienable rights, declaring that “there can be no Right, or Limitation of Right, inconsistent with, or opposite to the greatest public Good.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_and_legal_rights

I ask you, does this law grant “ALL” citizens inalienable rights, God given rights to be safe from harm?
No!

I studied criminal justice for years and one of the first things we learned was that,

“THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM WAS CREATED TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS OF SOCIETY.”
Not to harm them by forcing them to be placed in perilous situations!

The basic rights and freedoms for American citizens are guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, particularly in the Bill of Rights.

Our criminal justice model is one in which the majority of citizens in a society share the same values and beliefs. Criminal acts are acts that conflict with these values and beliefs and that are deemed harmful to society and the common good of the public and 0.2% -0.3% is hardly a majority.

Just let this sink in for a minute then take the necessary action to stop the madness!

https://www.aclu.org/bill-rights-brief-history

Advertisements

Two Constitutional Outrages

This is not only unconstitutional but un-American as well.
These people, or so called, are cowards and possess a monstrous demeanor!
They will be responsible for the destruction of America! The fools!

However; black LIES matter…

Please read this article.

Two Constitutional Outrages – http://wp.me/p1khVK-j6<a href="

image

God bless Donald Trump.

US GOVERNMENT OVER STEPPING THEIR BOUNDARIES

US GOV’T CAN’T FORCE APPLE TO UNLOCK IPHONE IN DRUG CASE – NY JUDGE – http://wp.me/p5Ofjn-BY

The US Justice Department does not have the authority to force Apple to unlock an iPhone involved in a Brooklyn drug case and hand the data over to the FBI, a New York judge ruled Monday.

In this case, the FBI was applying the same 18th century legislation that it argues must compel Apple to unlock the iPhone belonging to one of the shooters in the San Bernardino massacre.

“The government has failed to establish” that the All Writs Act of 1798 permits it to make Apple provide access to data stored on a locked iPhone,” US Magistrate Judge James Orenstein wrote in the ruling. He also stated that if the AWA does allow the FBI to make such an order, “discretionary factors” in the case compelled him to reject the motion.

In July of 2015, federal authorities looked to obtain a warrant to search an iPhone belonging to Jun Feng, a New Yorker charged with conspiracy to traffic in methamphetamine. However, Judge Orenstein gave Apple the chance to contest the government’s argument that it had the power to force the company to unlock the mobile device, and he ultimately decided that law enforcement’s argument wasn’t good enough to place the burden of unlocking the phone on Apple.

While the drug case that Orenstein ruled on is unrelated to the San Bernardino one, it’s nevertheless a significant victory for Apple as it continues to argue that it cannot be forced by law enforcement to create a “back door” into encrypted devices.

Read original article here: http://wp.me/p5Ofjn-BY

~ OPERATION MOCKINBIRD ~

image

Operation Mockingbird: Then and Now

By: Michael Howell
NOVEMBER 5, 2015

Operation Mockingbird. Sounds like an evil plot among birds, right? I can see a tree full of birds plotting against another group of birds calling their plan Operation Mockingbird. Well, this scenario isn’t that far fetched just substitute birds for people, keep the plotting, and think of the tree full of birds as actually Washington D.C. and the other tree as the American people. Maybe before we continue with the silly analogies we need to define what this operation really is and how it is manipulating what we see and hear.

Here is what many have officially defined as Operation Mockingbird. It is a government program that used C.I.A. personnel to infiltrate media organizations and their objective is to control the way we hear the news, receive the news, and even react to the news. Their goal is to discredit alternative media and place the focus on the mainstream media; which they control, run, write for, and present. How did this deception get conceived and is it still going on today?

Let’s define what it is and then we will look at is this program still active today. What we do know for sure is that Operation Mockingbird was a secret program of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) to manipulate the media as stated above. It got its roots in the early 1950’s and was originally started by Cord Meyer and Allen W. Dulles. When Dulles became head of the C.I.A., the program was taken over by Frank Wisner. Their objective was to recruit well known and respected journalist into their system to tell the C.I.A.’s views through a “legitimate” news source. They are even attributed with some student and culture organizations, buying news and magazine businesses, and major news outlet worldwide.

What would be their point in doing this? The answers here are numerous so I will touch on a couple. One, and probably the main reason, is to control political opinions and help create the division among us. Why would the C.I.A. want division between us? To implement the Cloward and Piven strategy, but I will touch on that strategy in another article. For times sake, let’s just say they can’t carry out their global agenda with a united populace. They need us divided and dependent on them, their system, their goals as the answer. Think of it as them creating a fictitious chaos so they can come in with the solution and appear to be the answer to all our problems.

Well how do we know where to get our news from and who is the reliable source. This is a question I get asked many times. The answer is really multi layered and needs to be addressed. It is very clear and obvious that mainstream media is under the influence of this operation even to this day. So, that really leaves us as the news source. It is because we have become dependent on mainstream media to tell us how to feel, what to eat, how to dress, what’s popular, what’s not, that led us to this point of disinformation. Just like if someone came into our home and took it over, it would be our responsibility to take back our house. This issue is no different. After all, they are coming into our house and taking over our thoughts, opinions, and way of life. Well, let’s take it back!

We can do this in many ways. With today’s social media, blogs like this one, and platforms to get our voice out there this is easier than ever to report accurate news. It is very important in today’s time to not post satire articles. This is a really big issue with me and needs to stop. Sure those articles can be witty, funny, and most times so far fetched that it can not only loose the person out there seeking the information, but discredit us in general. It is imperative that we do not become what we are fighting when the fight is about disinformation. There are many out there that may not be vocal in their fight, but are relying on you for their news.

Use social media to inform the unaware and to open up dialogue. This will not only help the information get out there, but will also open up that dialogue we seek to those that may not fully understand what is really going on. Share articles you find informative, accurate, and trustworthy. Build a pipeline of blogs, social media sites, friends, family, that you find to be engaged and aware. Talk the points all the way through to conclusion to not only get all the facts laid out, but to understand the issues better yourself. In summary, learn the lesson then go out and be the teacher. Important thing to remember is that you were not born awake and neither was the person you are trying to reach. Meet them where they are at in their understanding. If they are health conscious then don’t approach them about the Federal Reserve. It will be overwhelming and unproductive. Instead let them know about G.M.O.’s and the harms of vaccines. Once again, meet them where they are at. Do not use this time to show off how much you know, but instead help them get to where you are in understanding the fact. Baby steps.

Why alternative media and not mainstream media. Well, let’s look at who owns and operates these mega media sources. Before I go any further I’m not saying completely turn off mainstream media, just be aware of the global agenda when listening to them and do you own research. Always do you own research. Even when it comes to alternative media.

image

Take Fox News for example. They are the biggest and most watch news we have. Who owns them and what is their relationship to the globalist, or elitist? News Corp which is the parent company to Fox News is actually owned by Rupert Murdoch with Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal owning 7% of the operation. When dealing with the global agenda, Saudi is one of the most violent countries even though we refer to them as an ally. They have horrible domestic policy and actually, to date, has more beheadings than what we are seeing with ISIS. Saudi has also been implemented and tied to 9/11.

Whenever I engage in talks about Operation Mockingbird one name comes up every time. Anderson Cooper with CNN. His name is one of the most closely tied to Operation Mockingbird that I have found. There are numerous YouTube videos out there showing him being confronted on this topic and he always has the same reaction. Dismiss, deny, and belittle the person asking the question. Why? Ask me anything about my involvement in Operation Mockingbird and I would sit there and talk to you as any innocent person accused of being a part of this would do. There are many, many more out there that I will touch on in another article.

Another way of knowing our media is fake is the content in which they report on. We know our money is printed out of thin air, not backed by any thing, and then loaned out, with interest. Why is this not leading off every news cycle daily. Addressing the Federal Reserve, especially in today’s economy, would quickly get an audit, if not abolished completely when the American people really knows what our monetary system is about. Ironically, but by design, the Federal Reserve, or The Fed, is controlling the news through financing the main players and owners of the media.

image

How about undeclared wars? Why is this no leading the news cycle daily? We are a nation, in general, proud of our military and unite anytime we have to send our men and women overseas, so why not report on how these are illegal wars and not declared by Congress as the Constitution demands. Let’s not forget the troops swear an oath to the Constitution as well as the politicians sending them to war, so why are we not demanding they follow the document they swear to? Because many don’t even know what the Constitution says. That, too, is by design.

Look the the partisan platforms of the media outlets today. Depending on your political leanings is where and how you receive your news. If you are a republican you watch Fox News. Democrat, MSNBC, ect. Why and how did we allow this to happen. Media needs to be neutral. They need to tell us the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. When they take on a partisan stance they are helping perpetuate the division and even protecting the very elements they are suppose to be calling out. It’s not by accident that corruption has hit an all time high and reporting on the corruption has hit an all time low. It’s because of Operation Mockingbird.

image

It is very evident and clear that this C.I.A. program is not only still around, but thriving stronger than ever. We have the power to take it back and we should take the moral authority to do just that. We are in serious times globally and what gets reported needs to be the truth, regardless who it offends. We can do this and we can win. Only when we seek the truth and not partisan politics is when we will be free and informed. So get out there on your social media sites, blogs, radio shows, and activism activities and spread the truth. Spread it loud, spread it proud, and spread it gently. We will win by being the change we want to see. Let’s start with posting facts, not satire. Learning the lessons and then going out and being the teacher. I am reminded this 5th of November that truth is what set people free in the now infamous movie V for Vendetta, not partisan politics. I look forward to seeing you out there and learning from you all. Let’s be the peaceful end to Operation Mockingbird.

Written by: Michael Howell
What is the biggest threat to America

The Federal ReserveTerrorismThe economyImmigration

PUBLISHED BY: michaelh023
AMENDMENT, AGENDA21, C.I.A., CAPITALISM,CONTROLLED MEDIA, CRONY CAPITALISM, CURRENT NEWS, DISINFORMATION, FEDERAL RESERVE, GLOBAL GOVERNMENT, GLOBALISM, GUN CONTROL, GUN RIGHTS, LUCIFERIAN AGENDA, MEDIA, MOCKINGBIRD,NEW WORLD ORDER, OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD,POLITICS, PRESIDENT, PRESIDENTIAL, THE FED, U.N.,UNDECLARED WARS, UNITED NATIONS, WORLD NEWS

~Collecting rainwater on your own property can now lead to jail time~

Collecting rainwater on your own property can now lead to jail time,

as proven by a man from Oregon who was sentenced to prison for doing just that.  Who owns the rain? The US government, apparently so it seems.

image

Not so long ago, it was common practice across much of the world to collect rainwater into man made wells on your property to use for farming, irrigation and having fresh clean water.  It was just as common as canning your own food, having knowledge of at least some basic survival skills, and being self-sufficient.

It wasn’t even that many generations ago that all of this was common practice – people born before WWII were pretty adept at these skills, as they were a necessity to survival.  One of the main (and easiest) ways to ensure survival was to collecting rainwater on your own property.  The practical uses for storing and collecting rainwater are numerous and many people across the world in rural areas still do it today for all of the reasons listed above.  However, over the past few years, laws making the collection of rainwater illegal have been causing an uproar across the US.

Now, a man from Grey Point, Oregon has been sentenced to thirty days in prison for storing collected rainwater on his very own property – and the public is outraged.

A rural Oregon man was sentenced Wednesday to 30 days in jail and over $1,500 in fines because he had three reservoirs on his property to collect and use rainwater.

Gary Harrington of Eagle Point, Ore., says he plans to appeal his conviction in Jackson County (Ore.) Circuit Court on nine misdemeanor charges under a 1925 law for having what state water managers called “three illegal reservoirs” on his property – and for filling the reservoirs with rainwater and snow runoff.

“The government is bullying,” Harrington told CNSNews.com in an interview Thursday.

“They’ve just gotten to be big bullies and if you just lay over and die and give up, that just makes them bigger bullies. So, we as Americans, we need to stand on our constitutional rights, on our rights as citizens and hang tough. This is a good country, we’ll prevail,” he said.

image

The court has given Harrington two weeks to report to the Jackson County Jail to begin serving his sentence.

Harrington said the case first began in 2002, when state water managers told him there were complaints about the three “reservoirs” – ponds – on his more than 170 acres of land.

According to Oregon water laws, all water is publicly owned. Therefore, anyone who wants to store any type of water on their property must first obtain a permit from state water managers.

Harrington said he applied for three permits to legally house reservoirs for storm and snow water runoff on his property. One of the “reservoirs” had been on his property for 37 years, he said.

Though the state Water Resources Department initially approved his permits in 2003, the state – and a state court — ultimately reversed the decision.

“They issued me my permits. I had my permits in hand and they retracted them just arbitrarily, basically. They took them back and said ‘No, you can’t have them,’ so I’ve been fighting it ever since,” Harrington told CNSNews.com.

The case, he said, is centered on a 1925 law which states that the city of Medford holds exclusive rights to “all core sources of water” in the Big Butte Creek watershed and its tributaries.

Way back in 1925 the city of Medford got a unique withdrawal that withdrew all — supposedly all — the water out of a single basin and supposedly for the benefit of the city of Medford,” Harrington told CNSNews.com.

Harrington told CNSNews.com, however, that the 1925 law doesn’t mention anything about colleting rainwater or snow melt — and he believes that he has been falsely accused.

“The withdrawal said the stream and its tributaries. It didn’t mention anything about rainwater and it didn’t mention anything about snow melt and it didn’t mention anything about diffused water, but yet now, they’re trying to expand that to include that rain water and they’re using me as the goat to do it,” Harrington

But Tom Paul, administrator of the Oregon Water Resources Department, claims that Harrington has been violating the state’s water use law by diverting water from streams running into the Big Butte River.

“The law that he is actually violating is not the 1925 provision, but it’s Oregon law that says all of the water in the state of Oregon is public water and if you want to use that water, either to divert it or to store it, you have to acquire a water right from the state of Oregon before doing that activity,” Paul told CNSNews.com.

image

Read original article here: http://yournewswire.com/man-gets-prison-sentence-for-collecting-rainwater-on-his-own-property/

Why Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are not eligible to run for the Presidency

image

Why Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are not eligible to run for the Presidency.
By Fremont V Brown III

Rafael Eduardo “Ted” Cruz, was born in Calgary, Canada. Cruz’s father became a Canadian citizen during his residence in Canada. Once Cruz’s father returned to the US he renounced his Canadian citizenship.

But, what is very important is that Ted’s Father became a naturalized US citizen in 2005 long AFTER Ted was born. It is not necessary that a person be born within the US to be a Natural Born Citizen.  WHAT is necessary is that his parents must already be Citizens of the U.S. at the time he was born.  Vattel understood that US citizens might be abroad in the service of their Country and their child might be born in the foreign land.  Since children inherit, as a matter of natural right, the status of their parents, the Child is BORN a US citizen.  That is why John McCain is an NBC.  His father, already a US citizen, was stationed in the Panama Canal Zone.  His Mother, already a US Citizen, was living with her husband.  So their son, John, was BORN a Natural Born Citizen.

Marco Rubio is not a Natural Born Citizen. Neither of his parents were U.S. citizens at the time of Rubio’s birth in 1971.  His parents applied for U.S. citizenship and were naturalization in 1975, four years AFTER his birth.

Location of birth is always irrelevant.  All that matters is the citizenship status of the parents.  Both parents must be U.S. citizens.

Constitutional provisions:
Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States, under clause 5:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

The Twelfth Amendment states, “No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.”

Citizen by Birth or Naturalization is not the Same as a NATURAL BORN Citizen!

Note:  The Constitution can be “voided” ONLY if and when it is replaced by another Constitution.  Acts do not trump the Constitution. This means the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.

“The Naturalization Act of 1790 states quite clearly: a child born of a U.S.-born mother anywhere in the world is a U.S. citizen by birth and therefore a natural-born citizen,” Rafael Cruz said. – Washington Post, James Hohmann, August 31

Here is the wording of the Naturalization Act of 1790 – Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such Court that he is a person of good character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law to support the Constitution of the United States, which Oath or Affirmation such Court shall administer, and the Clerk of such Court shall record such Application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon such person shall be considered as a Citizen of the United States. And the children of such person so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty one years at the time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: Provided also, that no person heretofore proscribed by any States, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an Act of the Legislature of the State in which such person was proscribed.

U.S. Supreme Court, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874)

“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 168.

Note: The use of the word “CITIZENS” meaning both parents, not just one parent, in the Naturalization Act of 1790 and U.S. Supreme Court, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874) in order to be a natural born citizen.

Do you think that the reason that LIBERAL Academians that claim Ted Cruz is a Natural Born Citizen do not wish the public to be reminded that Obama’s birth parallels Cruz’s – that is only one parent was a U.S. Citizen?  And He, Obama like Cruz is not a Natural Born Citizen.

Natural Born Citizen
Publius Huldah – http://tarheelteaparty.org/?p=19955

What’s a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ and why a U.S. President Must Be One, with
KrisAnne Hall  http://tarheelteaparty.org/?p=19325

Understanding Citizenship by KrisAnne Hall http://tarheelteaparty.org/?p=19462

Who Makes the Ruling that Someone is not Qualified for the Office of President of the United States?
http://tarheelteaparty.org/?p=19833

For more on Natural Born Citizen http://tarheelteaparty.org/?page_id=5436 http://tarheelteaparty.org/?page_id=5436

Generals: Constitutional Crisis Could Force Military To Remove Obama

image

Generals: Constitutional Crisis Could Force Military To Remove Obama

Monday, November 16, 2015 4:09

In a interview with Trunews, Retired U.S. Air Force Lt. General Thomas McInerney and Retired U.S. Army General Paul Vallely spoke about the possibility of a Constitutional Crisis that may occur if Barack Obama refuses to protect the American people from the threat of ISIS and radical islam. The Generals also said that it may come to the point where the US Military may have to remove Obama from office. The Generals also stated that Obama has moved the US stance on Terrorism from one of fighting against it to one of providing it aid and comfort.

Read original article here:
http://beforeitsnews.com/self-sufficiency/2015/11/generals-constitutional-crisis-could-force-military-to-remove-obama-2496962.html